Please enable JS
  • Reduce AWS costs and fix backend performance issues in scaling SaaS systems.
    We help engineering teams optimize, modernize, and stabilize backend infrastructure using Go, AWS Lambda, and serverless architecture.
  • AWS spend should not grow blindly
    We find waste and fix the architecture
  • Production load exposes real bottlenecks
    Go services, queues, data paths—engineered, not guessed
  • Serverless and events when they earn their place
    Less ops drag, clearer boundaries

We work with

  • SaaS companies moving from MVP to serious growth
  • Engineering teams seeing AWS bills rise faster than revenue
  • Startups where APIs or workers fail under production traffic
  • CTOs modernizing legacy backends toward Lambda and event-driven design

Representative case studies

Anonymized examples reflecting common engagement patterns. Your architecture and numbers will differ; the approach is the same.

B2B SaaS — runaway Lambda bill

Problem: Monthly AWS spend jumped 3x after a traffic milestone. Lambda concurrency, API Gateway, and outbound data dominated; no single owner for cost.

Solution: Cost audit, concurrency and memory tuning, API caching layer, and removal of redundant cross-region chatter. Documented guardrails for future changes.

Result: ~32% infrastructure cost reduction within one billing cycle; p95 API latency improved ~40% from fewer duplicate calls.

Growth-stage API — timeouts at peak

Problem: Core Go service showed acceptable latency in staging but 5xx and tail latency spiked under production concurrency; database and fan-out patterns were the suspects.

Solution: Production profiling, query and batching fixes, bounded worker pools, and queue-backed offload for non-critical work.

Result: p99 latency ~60% lower at peak; error rate dropped below prior SLO; team gained a repeatable load profile for releases.

Legacy monolith — slow, risky deploys

Problem: Single deployable blocked feature teams; scaling meant bigger instances; incident recovery was manual.

Solution: Strangled high-churn domains into Lambda handlers and event buses; kept transactional core on existing DB with clear boundaries and observability.

Result: Deploy frequency moved from bi-weekly to multiple times per week for migrated surfaces; on-call pages for that domain dropped sharply in the following quarter.

When the bill or latency curve breaks, you need systems engineers—not a generic dev shop

Tell us about your stack, AWS footprint, and what production is doing under load. We respond with a scoped review or audit plan, not a pitch deck.

Frequently asked questions

What does Ciphergram do?

Ciphergram is a specialist backend systems consultancy. We help SaaS companies and scaling startups reduce AWS costs, improve backend performance, and modernize legacy systems using Go, AWS Lambda, and serverless architecture.

Who do you work best with?

SaaS teams scaling past MVP, engineering organizations with rising AWS bills, startups seeing production performance issues, and CTOs evolving legacy systems toward serverless and event-driven designs.

What is an AWS cost optimization audit?

A fixed-scope review of how your AWS bill maps to actual workloads: Lambda, API Gateway, compute, networking, and storage. You get a prioritized list of changes with expected savings and risk notes—not a generic dashboard export.

Do you work with existing Go codebases?

Yes. Go is a core language for our performance work. We profile services under load, tighten hot paths, and align concurrency and IO patterns with how your system runs in production.

How do engagements begin?

Most teams start with a backend systems review or a cost and performance audit. We clarify scope, access needs, and success metrics before work starts so expectations stay grounded in measurable infrastructure outcomes.

Request a backend systems review

Share your stack, symptoms, and AWS context. We reply with next steps for a cost analysis, performance audit, or migration assessment—usually within one business day.

No spam. We may ask one clarifying round by email before proposing scope.

×

Technologies Used:

i